Editorial Policy
The sourcing, review, correction and automation standards used across would.you.
Useful first, searchable second
Editorial purpose
We publish when a page gives a reader a distinct job to do: compare, reflect, discuss, choose or learn a reusable method. We do not make near-duplicate pages for keyword variants, locations or audiences when one strong page would answer the need.
Sources and uncertainty
We prefer primary research, public institutions and direct documentation. We distinguish a framework from a fact, label uncertainty, and avoid false precision. High-stakes decisions receive clear boundaries and prompts to seek a qualified professional.
Automation disclosure
Automation may help with structure, consistency checks and drafts. A human owner remains responsible for scope, usefulness, links, titles, claims and publication. Generated visuals are original, reviewed for relevance and optimized for the web.
Corrections
Material corrections change the reviewed date and are noted when they alter the conclusion. Readers can report an error through the contact page. We do not change dates merely to make pages appear fresh.
Continue exploring
Decision guide methodology
See the practical method behind first-party guides and tools.
Meet the editorial desk
Understand who is accountable for review and corrections.
Report an editorial issue
Send a correction with the page and supporting source.